January 2005 Press Release
New Guidelines Conclude All Aerosol Therapy Devices
Equally Effective
Patient Education on Aerosol Therapy Key to Effective
Asthma Control
(NORTHBROOK, IL, January 10, 2005) –New evidence-based guidelines
for the selection of aerosol medication devices conclude that health-care
providers should avoid basing device selection exclusively on device
efficacy. Instead, the choice should be based on other patient-related
factors. All aerosolized medication delivery systems are equally
effective when used properly. Aerosolized medication is typically
used to treat patients with respiratory conditions, such as asthma
or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
For the first time, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP)
and the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology (ACAAI)
have developed joint evidence-based guidelines for the selection
of aerosol delivery devices. Published in the January issue of CHEST,
the peer-reviewed journal of the ACCP, the guidelines were developed
by an international panel of pulmonary experts and provide recommendations
on overall device selection and device selection for several commonly
encountered clinical settings.
Based on a systematic review of pertinent randomized, controlled
trials (RCT), panel members compared metered-dose inhalers (MDIs)
with or without spacers/holding chambers, dry powder inhalers,
and nebulizers, delivering both bronchodilators (beta2-agonists)
and inhaled corticosteroids in order to determine the best recommendations
for device selection. To achieve a fair comparison, RCTs were selected
only if the same drug was used in the different delivery systems
tested. Due to the limited number of published RCTs of inhaled
corticosteroids, the majority of the studies reviewed and selected
were RCTs of bronchodilators. Overall, guidelines state that aerosolized
medication delivery systems, when used with comparable drug doses,
provide equivalent efficacy and, therefore, recommend that health-care
providers not base device selection exclusively on device efficacy
but rather on several criteria, including device availability;
cost; convenience; and the patient's age, competence in using the
device, and preference.
"The current practice of device selection for the delivery
of aerosolized asthma or COPD medication is largely based on the
device's effectiveness in delivering the medication to the patient.
Although there are advantages and disadvantages associated with
each device and medication, when used properly, all aerosol devices
can work equally well and can be interchanged," said guidelines
chair Myrna B. Dolovich, P.Eng, Associate Clinical Professor Medicine & Radiology,
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. "Health-care
providers should choose a device based on the individual characteristics
of each patient. If asthma control is not achieved using one delivery
device, it may be beneficial for patients to switch to another
device after consulting with his or her provider."
Guidelines also incorporate recommendations for device selection
in specific clinical settings, including the emergency department,
ICU, and inpatient and outpatient situations. Specific recommendations
include:
- Inpatient setting: Nebulizers and MDIs with
spacer/holding chambers are appropriate for use in the inpatient
setting.
- Emergency department setting: Nebulizers and
MDIs with spacer/holding chambers are appropriate for delivery
of beta2-agonists in the emergency department.
- Patients supported by mechanical ventilation:
Careful attention to details of the technique employed for administering
medications by MDI or nebulizer to mechanically ventilated patients
is critical, since multiple technical factors may have clinically
important effects on the efficiency of aerosol delivery.
Panel members also strongly recommend that clinicians provide
patients with sufficient instruction on the use of their aerosol
inhaler in order to maximize asthma control.
"Many health-care providers are confused by the large number
of aerosol delivery devices available and have difficulty explaining
their correct use to patients," said Professor Dolovich. "Physicians,
respiratory therapists, and nurses caring for patients with respiratory
diseases should be familiar with issues related to performance
and correct use of aerosol delivery devices in order to instruct
their patients on proper usage."
"Evidence-based guidelines are based on a comprehensive review
of clinical research findings, allowing medical professionals to
make the most effective and patient-focused decisions on the diagnosis
and treatment of diseases," said Paul A. Kvale, MD, FCCP,
President of the American College of Chest Physicians. "The
new evidence-based guidelines for aerosol therapy integrate individual
clinical expertise with the best available evidence on respiratory
medication and delivery devices. Ultimately, by following these
evidence-based guidelines, clinicians will have a more current
and consistent approach to selecting aerosol therapy for patients."
"Use of inhaled aerosols has revolutionized the care of obstructive
respiratory disease by allowing the selective delivery of optimal
concentrations of drugs to the airway without creating the undesirable
side effects that might result from systemic administration," said
Myron J. Zitt, MD, President of the American College of Allergy,
Asthma & Immunology. "Nonetheless, the caregiver is in
a quandary as to which aerosol delivery system is best for his
or her patient. The new evidence-based guidelines provide additional
criteria for device selection. Regardless of what delivery system
is chosen, patient education is essential to assure optimal outcomes."
Download a copy of Device
Selection and Outcomes of Aerosol Therapy: ACCP/ACAAI Evidence-Based
Guidelines or for more information, contact the ACCP
at (800) 343-ACCP (2227). The ACCP also offers Inhaled
Medications and Devices: Tips and Techniques, an interactive
patient education CD-ROM that demonstrates the proper techniques
of device usage and cleaning, as well as daily diaries and
peak flow management.
CHEST is a peer-reviewed journal published by the ACCP.
It is available online each month at www.chestjournal.org.
ACCP represents 16,000 members who provide clinical respiratory,
sleep, critical care, and cardiothoracic patient care in the United
States and throughout the world. The ACCP's mission is to promote
the prevention and treatment of diseases of the chest through leadership,
education, research, and communication.
The ACAAI is a professional medical organization comprising nearly
5,000 qualified allergists-immunologists and related health-care
professionals. The College is dedicated to the clinical practice
of allergy, asthma, and immunology through education and research
to promote the highest quality of patient care.
Contact:
Jennifer Stawarz,
(847) 498-8306
Jo Ann Faber, (847)
427-1200 x240
|