Not all of the performance measures sets that are sent to the ACCP for review and comment or approval will be applicable to the membership of the ACCP, and the workload of the Quality Improvement Committee (QIC) would be large if it reviewed them all. Therefore, the following criteria have been developed to select which sets will be brought to the members of the QIC for review and which will not. For those that are not selected, the staff liaison will send a response to the developing or endorsing organization, thanking them for the opportunity, but respectfully declining, based on the fact that there are other organizations whose expertise would be more valuable to that particular review process.
Selection Criteria:
The Quality Improvement Committee (QIC) developed a set of criteria to use in the review of proposed performance measures for improvement purposes and possible ACCP endorsement. These criteria will not only define the scope of the group’s determinations but also the specific standards by which the performance measures should be evaluated.
QIC objectives:
Criteria for Assessment of Performance Measures:
Overall, is this performance measure acceptable as written?
PDF Downloads
Ed Dellert, RN, MBA Vice President, Educational Resources Phone: (847) 498-8333 Fax: (847) 498-5460 edellert@chestnet.org
Joyce Bruno Reitzner, MBA, MIPH Assistant Vice President, Quality Improvement Phone: (847) 498-8120 Fax: (847) 498-5460 jbruno@chestnet.org
Jeffrey Maitland Program Coordinator Quality Improvement Phone: (847) 498-8369 Fax: (847) 498-5460 jmaitland@chestnet.org
