Committee Process for Public Comment or Voting
Process - ACCP Expertise Requested
Selection Criteria
Not all of the performance measures sets that are sent to the ACCP for review and comment or approval will be applicable to the membership of the ACCP, and the workload of the Quality Improvement Committee (QIC) would be large if it reviewed them all. Therefore, the following criteria have been developed to select which sets will be brought to the members of the QIC for review and which will not. For those that are not selected, the staff liaison will send a response to the developing or endorsing organization, thanking them for the opportunity, but respectfully declining, based on the fact that there are other organizations whose expertise would be more valuable to that particular review process.
Selection Criteria:
Pulmonary focus
Asthma
COPD
ARDS
Pneumonia
Lung cancer
Bronchitis
NAEB
Bronchiectasis
Tuberculosis
Cystic fibrosis
Atelectasis
Pulmonary abscess
Occupational/Environmental lung disease
Interstitial lung disease
UACS
Pulmonary rehabilitation
Pulmonary vascular
Pulmonary transplant
Critical care focus
Antithrombotics/VTE
Respiratory physiology and monitoring
Respiratory therapy issues
Arterial blood gas analysis
Airway management
Endotracheal intubation
Tracheostomy
Mechanical ventilation
Principles of positive pressure ventilation
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
Weaning from mechanical ventilation
Respiratory failure
Hypercapnic respiratory failure
Hypoxemic respiratory failure
ARDS
Life-threatening asthma
Pneumonia
Community-acquired pneumonia
Nosocomial pneumonia
Cardiovascular physiology and monitoring
Hemodynamic monitoring principles
Shock
Cardiac arrest
Advanced life support
Myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndromes
Cardiac arrhythmias
Congestive heart failure
Hypertensive crisis
Renal failure
Renal replacement in the ICU
Fluid and electrolyte disorders
Electrolyte disturbances
Crystalloid and colloid administration in the ICU
Endocrine disorders in the ICU
Adrenal insufficiency
Diabetes mellitus and glycemic control
Nutrition in the ICU
Enteral nutrition
Parenteral nutrition
GI disorders in the ICU
Upper GI bleeding
Lower GI bleeding
Pancreatitis
Hepatic failure
Cirrhosis and related complications
Hematologic disorders in the ICU
Blood product administration in the ICU
Bleeding disorders and coagulopathies
Oncologic disorders in the ICU
Complications of stem cell transplantation
Collagen vascular issues in the ICU
Nervous system disorders in the ICU
Coma and altered mental status
Cerebrovascular accident
Delirium in the ICU
Status epilepticus
Neuromuscular disorders
Managing sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade
Infectious disease issues in the ICU
Infection control/prevention of nosocomial infection
Management of immunocompromised patients
Antimicrobial agents
Fever in the ICU/disorders of temperature control
Severe sepsis and septic shock
Poisoning and drug overdose
Postoperative ICU issues
Trauma
Head trauma
Burns
Obstetrical and gynecologic issues in the ICU
Allergic and immunologic disorders in the ICU
Multiple organ failure
Critical care ethics
End-of-life issues
ICU management
Interdisciplinary care
ICU family care
Performance improvement and patient safety
Severity of illness
Psychosocial issues in the ICU
Pharmacology in the ICU
Disaster management
Invasive procedures in the ICU
Central venous catheterization
Arterial catheterization
Pulmonary artery catheterization
Sleep medicine focus
Insomnia
Hypersomnia not related to SRBD
Parasomnias
Sleep-related movement disorders
Restless legs syndrome
Circadian rhythm disorders
Sleep disorders particular to pediatrics
Normal sleep physiology
OSA, adult—pathophysiology and diagnosis
Cardiovascular perspectives of OSA
Surgical treatment of OSA
Positive airway pressure treatment of OSA
Dental appliance treatment of OSA
Weight loss and medical treatments for OSA
OSA, pediatric
Central sleep apnea syndromes
Cardiovascular perspectives of central sleep apnea
Sleep-related hypoventilation/hypoxemic syndromes
Nocturnal noninvasive ventilation
OSA and metabolic disorders
Polysomnography
Portable monitoring
MSLT/MWT
Actigraphy
Sleep-related problems in medical disorders
Sleep-related problems in neurologic disorders
Sleep-related problems in psychiatric disorders
Sleep in the ICU
Sleep deprivation
Sleep in women
Sleep and aging
Legal issues in sleep medicine
Other
Tobacco cessation
Criteria for Assessment of Performance Measures
The Quality Improvement Committee (QIC) developed a set of criteria to use in the review of proposed performance measures for improvement purposes and possible ACCP endorsement. These criteria will not only define the scope of the group’s determinations but also the specific standards by which the performance measures should be evaluated.
QIC objectives:
Reliable and valid criteria
Measurability
Clinical applicability
Ease of implementation, including education on implementation
Criteria for Assessment of Performance Measures:
Practicality for ACCP members and their patients
Helpful to ACCP members, including physicians, nurses, and other practitioners
Appropriate to the diversity of physicians and type of hospitals of ACCP members, including variation in practice size and location
Ease of data collection for ACCP members
Any other barriers that are specific to ACCP chest, critical care, and sleep medicine physicians
Importance
Assesses an important leverage point for improving quality: significant to target audiences; impact on health
Opportunity for improvement, considerable variation in quality of care exists
Aspect of quality is under provider or health system control
This measure does not create incentives or rewards to improve without truly improving quality of care
Scientific acceptability
Relationship to quality is based on best available scientific evidence
Well defined and precisely specified
Valid and measures the intended aspect of quality; accurately represents the concept being evaluated; data sources are comparable
Adequate proportion of total variation is explained by provider performance and amount of variation in measurement is small after provider performance and patient characteristics are taken into account
Reliable, producing the same results a high proportion of time in the same population
Precise, adequately discriminating between real differences in provider performance and reasonable sample size exists to detect actual differences; captures all possible cases and bias related to case exclusion or limited data are minimal
Risk adjustment is adequate to address confounding bias, if applicable
Usability
Effective (understandable and clear) presentation and dissemination strategies exist
Statistical testing can be applied to communicate when differences in performance levels are greater than would be expected by chance
Has been used effectively in the past and/or have high potential for working well with other indicators currently in use
Compelling content for stakeholder decision making
Feasibility
Consistent construction and assessment of the measure
Feasible to calculate; benefits exceed financial and administrative burden of
implementation
Confidentiality concerns are addressed
Audit strategy can be implemented, quality of data is known
Overall, is this performance measure acceptable as written?
PDF Downloads
NetWork or Guideline Panel Review Form
QI Interfaces on the National Scene
QI Interfaces within the ACCP