Logout
 ACCP Evidence-Based
 Guidelines
    Definitions of
   ACCP Evidence-Based
   Guidelines, Consensus
   Statements, and Other
   Reviews and Projects
   Current ACCP
   Guidelines
   External Resources
   Guideline Development
   Guideline Proposal
   Application
   Guideline Request
   For Endorsement
   Instructions to Authors
   Products
   ACCP Guidelines
   in the News
   Evidence Based
   Medicine
 CME Certificates
 Education Calendar
 Online Education
 Center of Excellence for
 Learning and Teaching
 Consensus Statements
 
 

How to Develop a Guideline

 

Previous Question | Main page | Next Question

How is evidence reviewed?

Primary literature reviews are sometimes funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) through Evidence-Based Practice Centers (EPCs) utilizing a formal solicitation process for topic selection

At times, the ACCP methodologist or a panel member experienced in evidence-based medicine may do the literature review.

At other times, the ACCP may contract directly with the EPCs through a proposal-based bidding process.

  • When use of an EPC is planned, a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the evidence review must be submitted to the EPCs. To review an outline and sample RFP, please click here.

Steps in the literature review include:

  1. Topic assessment and modification
  2. Development of inclusion and exclusion criteria
  3. Refinement and focus of the clinical questions to be addressed
  4. Design of the literature identification strategy
  5. Screening of the studies for inclusion
  6. Collection and abstraction of the data
  7. Summarization of the data in evidence tables, using meta-analysis if possible
  8. Assignment of the quality of evidence ratings
  9. External peer review (optional).