Logout
 ACCP Evidence-Based
 Guidelines
    Definitions of
   ACCP Evidence-Based
   Guidelines, Consensus
   Statements, and Other
   Reviews and Projects
   Current ACCP
   Guidelines
   External Resources
   Guideline Development
   Guideline Proposal
   Application
   Guideline Request
   For Endorsement
   Instructions to Authors
   Products
   ACCP Guidelines
   in the News
   Evidence Based
   Medicine
 CME Certificates
 Education Calendar
 Online Education
 Center of Excellence for
 Learning and Teaching
 Consensus Statements
 
 

How to Develop a Guideline

 

Previous Question | Main page | Next Question

What are the roles and responsibilities of panel members?

The Guideline Panel is steered by an Executive Committee, that is made up of the Chair or Co-Chairs, the methodologist, and the project coordinator. The Executive Committee is charged with keeping the project on track and promoting communication and oversight.

  1. Panel Chair
    The Panel Chair is chosen for his or her reputation as a clinician and/or scientist in the topic area, ability to organize and work well with a group, and track record of delivering quality products in a timely fashion. The Panel Chair is responsible for:

    • Reviewing recommendations for nomination of panel members.
    • Working with staff to appoint a methodologist to assist the panel.
    • Participating in regular planning sessions and conference calls with the methodologist and staff.
    • Developing a proposed scope and outline of the report for discussion at the first panel meeting.
    • Supervising responsibilities related to literature reviews and guideline writing.
    • Editing reports for scientific content and completeness.
    • Participating in activities related to the dissemination of the report, including the development of tools and products related to the guideline.
    • The Panel Chair should set an example and encourage the panel to follow the processes and regulations for guideline development, assuring that "Instructions to Authors of CHEST" and HSP criteria are followed.
  2. Panel Members and/or Chapter Chairs
    Panelists are chosen with regard to diversity in geographic location, clinical and/or scientific expertise, gender, and ACCP membership, in addition to, writing skills and the ability to work well on a team. Nominations for panel member positions are sought from the NetWorks, the HSP Committee, the Panel Chair(s), and other panelists. Furthermore, ACCP members, ACCP staff, and the Board of Regents may recommend additional panel members to the Chair and/or Co-Chairs; however, the HSP Committee must approve all nominations.  One HSP Committee member shall serve as the HSP liaison, and at least one panel member should have experience in evidence–based medicine.

    The ACCP should maintain a current curriculum vita for each approved panel member. All panel members and individuals assisting panel members, including Evidence Practice Center (EPC) team members, junior faculty and students shall abide by and sign the ACCP Policy on Conflict of Interest prior to initiating their work, and through out the entire guideline development process.

  3. HSP Liaison
    Prior to convening the Guideline Panel Chair, one member from the HSP Committee will be appointed as a liaison. During this time, the liaison member represents the HSP Committee and works with the ACCP staff to identify the Chair and potential guideline panel members. Once the Chair is nominated and a panel is selected, the liaison member is responsible for communicating the progress of the panel and any procedural questions regarding the panel and the guideline to the HSP Committee.

  4. Termination of Panelist Participation
    The HSP Committee is the final arbiter of the termination of any guideline panel participant. The panel Chair or Co-Chairs can seek the advice of the HSP Committee through the HSP liaison. Termination must be documented in writing.

    Panelist participation in the development of an ACCP guideline may be terminated for reasons including, but not limited to, the following:

    • Failure to disclose conflict of interest
    • Nonparticipation
    • Failure to complete assignments
    • Inability to work as a team member