Logout
 ACCP Evidence-Based
 Guidelines and Products
 HSP Functions and
 Processes
 Guideline Development
 Processes
   HSP Publications and
   Related Editorials on
   Guideline Development
   Panel selection and
   Conflict of Interest:
   An Overview
   Roles and
   Responsibilities
   of Panel Members
   Guideline Topic
   Selection Criteria
   Defining Research
   Questions
   Reviewing the Evidence
   The ACCP Grading
   System for Guideline
   Recommendations
   Appraising Guidelines
   Writing and Formatting
   Instructions
   Review of Guidelines
   General Timeline for
   Guideline Development
 Suggest a Future
 Guideline Topic
 Request for ACCP
 Endorsement of
 Guidelines
 HSP Calendar
 External Resources
 Contact HSP Staff
 
 

Health and Science Policy and Evidence-Based Medicine

General Timeline for Guideline Development

The following is an approximate guide for the time required to complete each step in the guideline development process.

General Timeline for Guideline Development*
Timeframe (Months) ACCP Events Executive Committee Events Panel Events EPC Events/In-House Methodologist Events
1 HSP selects Chair(s)      
1-2 Chair(s) select panel nominees in consultation with HSP and NetWork(s)   RFP submitted to EPCs
1-3     Panel nominations submitted  
2-4 HSP reviews nominees’ submissions     Deadline for evidence review applications
2-4 Selection of EPC      
3-5 Contract with EPC      
5 Panel Planning Meeting or Conference Call
(Including HSP Liaison and Methodologist)
5-6   Research questions finalized
5-6 Invitations for representation from other associations   Systematic literature review begins
6-7     Chapter outline drafts due or outline of single chapter guideline due Existing guidelines, systematic reviews, and metaanalyses sent to panelists
6-8     Source articles and papers sent to panelists
6-8     Additional important papers and articles identified by conference calls
9       Evidence tables (first drafts) due
9-10     Writing committees review and respond to evidence tables
10-11       Revised evidence tables due
12-13       Summary tables due
12-13     Writing committees review and respond to summary tables
13-14   Executive Committee review commences First drafts of chapters due  
14-16   Executive Committee review continues Chapter revisions due  
14-15   Conference calls to sort out internal inconsistencies Background (evidence) drafts due
15-16   Chapters posted for panel and association representatives’ review
17 Panel Conference
18-19   Executive Committee review Deadline for revisions  
20 Submission for HSP, BOR, and NW review      
20-21 NW review
forwarded to
HSP and BOR
     
21-22 HSP review      
22-23   Changes/revisions, as needed  
22-23 HSP confirmation of changes      
23-24 HSP approval      
24-25 BOR review      
25-26   Changes/revisions, as needed  
26-27 BOR confirmation of changes      
27 BOR approval      
27 Submission to journal      
27-28 Editor’s review for approval      
27-29 Outside peer review      
28-30   Changes/revisions, as needed  
29-31   Drafts of content for clinical resource tool due (contingent upon funding)  
31-33 Publication of EBG      
32-34 Distribution of clinical resource      

*This timeline assumes the topic has received ACCP Board of Regents approval and funding.
Single chapter guidelines require less development time.
Abbreviations:

HSP: Health and Science Policy Committee
EPC: evidence-based practice center
RFP: request for proposal
BOR: ACCP Board of Regents