Logout
 ACCP Evidence-Based
 Guidelines and Products
 HSP Functions and
 Processes
 Guideline Development
 Processes
   HSP Publications and
   Related Editorials on
   Guideline Development
   Panel selection and
   Conflict of Interest:
   An Overview
   Roles and
   Responsibilities
   of Panel Members
   Guideline Topic
   Selection Criteria
   Defining Research
   Questions
   Reviewing the Evidence
   The ACCP Grading
   System for Guideline
   Recommendations
   Appraising Guidelines
   Writing and Formatting
   Instructions
   Review of Guidelines
   General Timeline for
   Guideline Development
 Suggest a Future
 Guideline Topic
 Request for ACCP
 Endorsement of
 Guidelines
 HSP Calendar
 External Resources
 Contact HSP Staff
 
 

Health and Science Policy and Evidence-Based Medicine

HSP Publications and Related Editorials on Guideline Development

Baumann MH, Lewis SZ, Gutterman D. ACCP evidence-based guideline development: a successful and transparent approach addressing conflict of interest, funding, and patient-centered recommendations. Chest 2007; 132:1015-1024

Clancy CM, Slutsky JR. Guidelines for guidelines: we've come a long way. Chest 2007; 132:746-747

Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest 2006; 129:174-181

Guyatt G, Baumann M, Pauker S, et al. Addressing resource allocation issues in recommendations from clinical practice guideline panels: suggestions from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest 2006; 129:182-187

Baumann MH, Gutterman D. American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based guidelines – the next generation: considering resource use and evolution to a single grading system. Chest 2006; 129:10-11

See also, Current ACCP Guidelines and Clinical Resources and Other Products