 |
 |
| ACCP-SEEK |
| CME Information |
| CME Availability |
| CME Instructions |
| Critical Care Program Committee |
| Pulmonary Program Committee |
| SEEK Sample Questions |
| Purchase SEEK |
CME InformationCME InformationThe Assessment in Critical Care and Pulmonology Self-Education and Evaluation of Knowledge (ACCP-SEEK) is an self-study opportunity in printed format for pulmonary and critical care physicians and fellows-in-training, that fulfills an educational need by providing the latest advances in pulmonary and critical care medicine posed by case-based questions on a variety of diseases, procedures, and disorders. The American College of Chest Physicians has identified an educational need to update and review existing knowledge and skills, present new information, and provide a preparation tool for board examinations. Each question and rationale, if reviewed thoroughly, should take the user approximately 15-20 minutes to review, research the appropriate response, identify the corresponding correct response, and review the rationale for the correct response. Each ACCP-SEEK volume has a total of 200 questions. CME StatementThe American College of Chest Physicians designates this educational activity for a maximum of 50.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Accreditation StatementThe American College of Chest Physicians is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.Financial DisclosureThe American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) remains strongly committed to providing the best available evidencebased clinical information to participants of this educational activity and requires an open disclosure of any potential conflict of interest identified by our faculty members. It is not the intent of the ACCP to eliminate all situations of potential conflict of interest, but rather to enable those who are working with the ACCP to recognize situations that may be subject to question by others. All disclosed conflicts of interest are reviewed by the educational activity course director/chair, the Education Committee, or the Conflict of Interest Review Committee to ensure that such situations are properly evaluated and, if necessary, resolved. The ACCP educational standards pertaining to conflict of interest are intended to maintain the professional autonomy of the clinical experts inherent in promoting a balanced presentation of science. Through our review process, all ACCP CME activities are ensured of independent, objective, scientifically balanced presentations of information. Disclosure of any or no relationships will be made available on-site during all educational activities. ACCP-SEEK XVII DisclosuresThe following committee members of the ACCP-SEEK XVII program have disclosed to the ACCP that a relationship does exist with the respective company/organization as it relates to their question content material and should be communicated to the participants of this educational activity: Meyer S. Balter, MD, FCCP Gene L. Colice, MD, FCCP Stephanie M. Levine, MD, FCCP Neil R. MacIntyre, MD, FCCP COL Lisa K. Moores, MC, USA, FCCP George A. Sarosi, MD, FCCP The following committee members of the ACCP-SEEK XVII program have indicated to the ACCP that no potential conflict of interest exists with any respective company/organization, and this should be communicated to the participants of this educational activity: Michael H. Baumann, MD, FCCP |
 |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|