Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

By Marc A. Judson, MD

To print for Mac press 'Cmd+p' on your keyboard.
To print for Windows press 'Ctrl+p' on your keyboard.

Objectives
  1. Identify the typical clinical signs, symptoms, and laboratory findings in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA).
  2. Understand the basics of the immunopathogenesis of ABPA.
  3. Identify the diagnostic criteria for ABPA.
  4. Identify the clinical stages of ABPA.
  5. Understand the therapeutic options for ABPA.
Key words

allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; Aspergillus; asthma; azoles; corticosteroids; therapy

Abbreviations

ABPA = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; ABPA-CB = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with central bronchiectasis; ABPA-S = serologic allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; CF = cystic fibrosis; IL = interleukin; Th2 = T-helper type 2

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a hypersensitivity disease of the lungs virtually always related to Aspergillus fumigatus. This disease is seen in patients who have cystic fibrosis (CF) or poorly controlled asthma. The natural history is that of chronic immunologic, clinical, and radiologic episodes of relapse and remission.1 Therapy for ABPA involves prophylaxis against and treatment of acute exacerbations, as well as prevention of end-stage fibrotic disease.2,3 The disease is often undiagnosed for several years, and this may result in the development of permanent lung damage before appropriate therapy is initiated. This lesson will outline the clinical features, diagnostic criteria, and current treatment strategies for ABPA.

Clinical Features of ABPA
Clinical Presentation

ABPA was initially described as a disease characterized by episodic wheezing, pulmonary infiltrates, sputum and blood eosinophilia, pyrexia, and sputum containing brown flecks or plugs.4 Almost all ABPA patients have clinical asthma. The inflammatory response of ABPA is associated with tenacious sputum that cannot be expectorated by the patient.5 This mucus is usually not removable even with vigorous bronchoscopy.5 This mucoid impaction, usually coupled with central bronchiectasis, typically results in radiographic abnormalities (vide infra) that suggest the diagnosis. Patients with ABPA are highly atopic in that several other allergic conditions—such as allergic rhinitis, exercise induced asthma, and immediate cutaneous reactivity to non-Aspergillus skin testing—are often present.5,6

Epidemiology

ABPA is most commonly diagnosed between the third and fifth decades of life, but has been recognized in infants, young adults, and the elderly.7 The disease may remain undiagnosed for years, as it is often mistaken for “routine” asthma or another atopic condition.7,8 There is no sex or racial predilection.8 Virtually all patients with ABPA have asthma that ranges from mild to corticosteroiddependent, severe asthma. Approximately 3 to 5% of patients in asthma clinics have ABPA.9 More than half of ABPA patients have corticosteroid-dependent asthma,10 and 7 to 14% of corticosteroid-dependent asthmatics in the United States have ABPA.11 Many patients with CF have airway colonization with Aspergillus spp, and ABPA develops in 7 to 9% of them.12,13

Radiographic Features

The radiographic features of ABPA often distinguish it from a routine case of asthma, and therefore are important clues to the diagnosis. Typically, the chest radiograph in ABPA reveals transient areas of consolidation. These consolidations were reported to be more common in the upper lobes,14-16 although some series suggest that there may not be a specific lobar predominance.17,18 The consolidations may be bilateral.14 These opacifications are caused by bronchial obstruction with mucus plugs. A bronchus filled with mucus may form a band shadow or glove-finger shadow (Fig 1).14 These fleeting shadows are a characteristic feature of the disease and may be relieved by coughing up a mucus plug. A ring sign or parallel shadows (tram lines), representing inflamed bronchi, may be seen on chest radiographs (Fig 2). Although bronchiectasis is characteristically central in location in ABPA, asthmatic patients without ABPA may also have central bronchiectasis.1,19 Nonetheless, CT findings of central bronchiectasis, bronchiectasis affecting three or more lobes, and mucoid impaction (Fig 3) are highly suggestive of ABPA in asthmatic patients,16,19,20 and warrant further diagnostic testing.1 On occasion, the CT scan findings may be entirely normal in ABPA.16


Figure 1. Chest radiograph of a patient with ABPA demonstrating the classic glove-finger pattern, representing central bronchiectatic airways that are impacted with mucus.


Figure 2. Ring shadows (long arrows) and tram lines (short arrow) seen on chest radiograph in an ABPA patient. The former represent bronchiectatic airways seen in cross-section, the latter seen longitudinally.


Figure 3. Chest CT scan demonstrating dilated, mucoid-impacted bronchiectatic airways in an ABPA patient.


Immunopathogenesis

The immunopathogenesis of ABPA is not completely understood. It is thought that the airways are initially colonized with A fumigatus, which produces at least 15 to 20 antigens that are recognized by IgE molecules on mast cells.1,2 Interaction of these antigens with IgE causes mast cell degranulation, releasing mediators that cause vasodilation and vascular leakage so that serum components, including anti-Aspergillus IgG, enter the bronchi and combine with Aspergillus antigen to form IgG-containing immune complexes.2 These complexes cause activation of the complement cascade, leading to inflammation and pulmonary damage.2 Specific Aspergillus antigens have been identified that cause IgE and IgG responses in ABPA patients but not in non-ABPA asthma patients.21,22 In addition to a type I and type III immune response, ABPA is also associated with an abnormal T-lymphocyte cellular immune response. A fumigatus antigens are processed by antigen presenting cells and presented to T lymphocytes. The T- lymphocyte response in ABPA is skewed towards a T-helper type 2 (Th2) response, manifested by the production of Th2 cytokines, including interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13,23 causing an allergic inflammatory pattern. IL-4 may induce a positive feedback response to further stimulate Th2 lymphocytes.24 These abnormal T lymphocytes may be related to a genetic defect, as studies have shown that ABPA patients have a high frequency of the major histocompatability class II alleles that are associated with abnormalities of Th2 lymphocytes.25

Histologic Findings

Because the diagnosis of ABPA is made largely by clinical evaluation and laboratory testing, the study of lung biopsy specimens to confirm ABPA is usually not required.26,27 There are two distinct pathologic processes, one centered on the airways and the other affecting the lung parenchyma.28 The bronchi contain tenacious mucus consisting of fibrin, Curschmann’s spirals, Charcot-Leyden crystals, eosinophils, and mononuclear cells.27 Fungal hyphae may be seen in the bronchial lumen, and Aspergillus may be isolated in culture.27 Giant cells may be observed in the bronchial lumen. Bronchiectasis may occur in the segmental and subsegmental bronchi.29 Bronchocentric granulomatosis, in which the bronchiolar wall is replaced with granulomatous inflammation consisting of palisading histiocytes surrounded by lymphocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils,26 is commonly observed.

The distal lung may show inflammatory cells, granulomata, multinucleated giant cells, and eosinophilic infiltration. Distal lung inflammation is not thought to result in permanent lung damage; however, such damage may occur in the airways in the form of proximal bronchiectasis and irreversible airway obstruction.28

Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnostic criteria for ABPA have evolved over several decades.30,31 Table 1 lists the diagnostic clinical, laboratory, and serologic findings consistent with a diagnosis of ABPA.31 Each of the tests in Table 1 has an imperfect sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ABPA; therefore, there are no absolute criteria to diagnose or exclude the disease.8


Table 1. Clinical Criteria of ABPA *
Clinical/Laboratory
Feature Essential for Diagnosis
Comment
Asthma
Yes†
Chest radiographic infiltrate
No
Immediate cutaneous reactivity to Aspergillus
Yes
Elevated total serum IgE >1,000 ng/mL
Yes
May be suppressed by corticosteroids
Precipitating antibodies to A fumigatus
Yes
May be suppressed by corticosteroids
Peripheral blood eosinophilia
No
May be suppressed by corticosteroids
Central bronchiectasis
No
Essentially diagnostic in non-CF patients
*Adapted from Greenberger and Patterson.31
†Unless patient has CF.

Another classification scheme has been proposed (Table 2)3 wherein the diagnosis can be made by serologic or clinical criteria. According to this scheme, the presence of asthma, eosinophilia, fleeting infiltrates on chest radiograph, and central bronchiectasis would be virtually diagnostic of ABPA even without serologic confirmation. In addition, Table 2 shows that the diagnosis of ABPA can be made serologically (if all four tests in Table 2 are positive) without the presence of bronchiectasis. These patients are classified as having serologic ABPA (ABPA-S) in distinction to ABPA with central bronchiectasis (ABPA-CB).


Table 2. Summary of Clinical, Laboratory, and Serologic Findings Consistent With a Diagnosis of ABPA*
Studies
Diagnostic Value
Clinical or laboratory findings

Asthma

ABPA possible

Eosinophilia

ABPA possible

Fleeting pulmonary infiltrates

ABPA possible
Central bronchiectasis
ABPA almost certain
Serologic assessment

Precipitins against A fumigatus positive

All four tests positive: diagnosis is established.
Three tests positive: diagnosis very likely.
Two tests positive: diagnosis possible.

IgE antibody >2 times asthma control

IgG antibody >2 times asthma control

Total serum IgE >1,000 ng/mL

Clinical serologic result

Total serum IgE declines by 50 to 75% after treatment with prednisone

Consistent with ABPA
*Adapted from Patterson et al.3
†Often with mucoid impaction.

Rarely, ABPA may be caused by an Aspergillus sp other than A fumigatus or by a non-Aspergillus sp.29,32,33 In these instances, the serologic tests in relation to A fumigatus will be negative.

A diagnostic algorithm has been proposed for ABPA (Fig 4).1 Clinical clues that suggest ABPA include refractory asthma, asthma with radiographic infiltrates, asthma with bronchiectasis, asthma with prominent peripheral eosinophilia, CF with a prominent symptom of wheezing, and asthma with expectoration of brown plugs.


Figure 4. A proposed algorithm for the diagnosis of APBA. AF = Aspergillus fumigatus. Reprinted with permission from Vlahakis and Aksamit.1


Clinical Stages and Natural History of ABPA

Clinical experience in treating patients with ABPA has resulted in an understanding that the disease may progress through various stages. The stages are based on clinical, serologic, and radiographic findings. These stages are not phases of the disease and need not occur in order.31 The first four stages are potentially reversible with no long-term sequelae. However, the fifth stage, in which bronchiectasis or fibrosis develops, is not reversible.10

Stage 1: Acute Stage

This stage is associated with moderate or severe asthma, productive cough (mucus plugs may be expectorated), and pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiograph. These findings disappear completely with corticosteroid treatment.31

Stage 2: Remission

During remission, the patient continues to be asymptomatic or has mild asthma after discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy. The serum IgE level usually remains elevated at half of the peak IgE level during the acute stage.31 The patient may remain in remission permanently or for a variable period of time.

Stage 3: Recurrent Exacerbation

This exacerbation is usually apparent, with recurrence of the same findings as in stage I. However, in some cases the exacerbation is marked by serology (total IgE) because clinical findings may be subacute and radiographic findings may be absent.31 Serum IgE rises to at least double the baseline level, and such an increase often antedates clinical or radiographic worsening.31

Stage 4: Corticosteroid-Dependent Asthma

The disease may evolve to this stage from any of the previous stages.31 Exacerbations marked by worsening asthma, radiographic changes, and an increase in IgE level may occur.31

Stage 5: Fibrotic Lung Disease

Changes of central bronchiectasis and pulmonary fibrosis occur that are irreversible. Pulmonary function tests demonstrate a restrictive pattern alone or with superimposed obstruction. Patients at this stage may still have asthma, but findings of restriction and cor pulmonale predominate.31

This classification scheme for ABPA differentiates ABPA-S into stages 1 through 4, while those with stage 5 have ABPA-CB. Regardless of which classification system is used, it has been proposed that patients with ABPA who do not have bronchiectasis are in an early phase of ABPA and that early treatment of initial disease and subsequent exacerbations may prevent progression to lung fibrosis and bronchiectasis.2 Obviously, it is advantageous for ABPA to be diagnosed before permanent lung injury has occurred.

Pharmacotherapy

The main goals of therapy for APBA are to treat acute exacerbations of disease and prevent the development of the fibrotic stage and bronchiectasis. Therefore, an important part of therapy is to establish the diagnosis of ABPA early, before permanent lung damage has occurred. Pharmacotherapy for ABPA involves the use of systemic (oral) corticosteroids, metered-dose inhaler medications, and antifungal therapy. General guidelines for therapy are outlined in Table 3.


Table 3. Guidelines for Therapy of ABPA*
Drug Therapy
Dose

Acute

0.5–1.0 mg/kg/d† for 1–2 wk, then 0.5 mg/kg/d†
every other day for 6–12 wk, then attempt to taper off

Chronic (steroid-dependent)

>7.5 mg/d†; consider itraconazole
Bronchodilators

b-Agonists

? Follow NIH asthma guidelines

Inhaled corticosteroids

Consider in steroid-dependent patients; ? follow NIH
asthma guidelines
Antifungals

Itraconazole

100 mg bid; consider in steroid-dependent patients
*NIH = National Institutes of Health.
†Prednisone equivalent.

Corticosteroids

The cornerstone of treatment of ABPA has been to use systemic corticosteroids to suppress the inflammatory response provoked by A fumigatus, rather than removing the organism.30,34,35 This may require prolonged treatment with high doses of corticosteroids.35

Although corticosteroids are the primary therapy for ABPA, most of the supportive data have come from uncontrolled trials involving small numbers of patients.30,35-38 These studies have shown that corticosteroids control asthma symptoms, treat exacerbations, and prevent exacerbations.35 It is not known if corticosteroids prevent loss of lung function or disease progression.35

Recommended corticosteroid doses for acute exacerbations of disease are 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg of prednisone equivalent daily for 1 to 2 weeks, followed by 0.5 mg/kg every other day for 6 to 12 weeks; after that, the dose is tapered in an attempt to wean the patient off corticosteroids.10,30,39 Symptoms of wheezing, dyspnea, and cough usually remit rapidly with this regimen. As the dose of prednisone is decreased, patients may develop symptoms of mild asthma that can be controlled with inhaled bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids in many instances.30 However, some patients—8 of 25 (32%) in one series39—require an increase in their prednisone dose. Some patients cannot be successfully weaned off corticosteroids without developing exacerbations. One study of 28 corticosteroid-dependent ABPA patients treated with a mean daily dose of 7.4 mg of prednisolone for 11 years showed no deterioration in forced vital capacity or FEV1, suggesting that corticosteroids may prevent progression to end-stage fibrotic disease.36

Monitoring the Need for Corticosteroid Therapy

It is recommended that the physician regularly monitor the serum IgE level in ABPA patients,31,40 although the importance of this test is controversial. Longterm follow-up of ABPA patients has demonstrated that clinical symptoms and airway obstruction are not always reliable indicators of disease activity.41,42 Regular determination of serum IgE helps to identify flares, and levels often increase prior to exacerbations of ABPA.31 However, it is unknown if detecting and treating these asymptomatic flares alters the outcome of ABPA. Serum IgE levels decline with a clinical response to corticosteroids.31 Baseline levels should be determined when the disease has been controlled with corticosteroid therapy, and levels should be measured every 1 to 2 months thereafter.10 The total serum IgE usually does not return to normal, and corticosteroids should not be continued only to “treat” this laboratory result. Consideration should be given to reinstitution of corticosteroids, even in asymptomatic patients, if the serum IgE doubles from baseline values.10

A less controversial reason for treatment of ABPA is the development of radiographic findings of pulmonary fibrosis, mucoid impaction, pulmonary infiltrates, and bronchiectasis.26 Lung damage is occurring in these patients, and they should be given a trial of corticosteroids. Many of these patients require chronic low-dose corticosteroids.26 If corticosteroids are discontinued in these patients, they should be closely monitored with frequent pulmonary function testing, chest radiography, and serum IgE levels; patients should be treated with corticosteroids if these parameters worsen.43 It has been recommended that a daily corticosteroid dose of ≥ 7.5 to 10 mg of prednisone be used in such patients,36-38 and that chest radiographs be obtained every 3 months during the first year of follow-up and yearly thereafter.27 Pulmonary function tests are recommended on a yearly basis.27

Inhaled Corticosteroids

Three studies have directly addressed the use of inhaled corticosteroids for ABPA, and the results have been conflicting. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of inhaled beclomethasone 400 µg daily demonstrated better control of asthma symptoms in 32 ABPA patients.44 However, radiographic deterioration and pulmonary eosinophilia were not lessened by inhaled corticosteroids, suggesting that these medications alleviate asthmatic symptoms but not the underlying destructive inflammatory mechanisms of ABPA. In contrast, two other studies have suggested that inhaled corticosteroids may be beneficial for patients with ABPA. In one study, 87% of ABPA patients (13/15) treated with 400 µg/d of inhaled beclomethasone experienced symptomatic improvement.45 Of the 10 patients who had been receiving long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy, 8 (80%) were able to discontinue this therapy within 2 weeks of starting inhaled corticosteroids. Radiographic clearing occurred within 1 month of starting inhaled corticosteroids in 7 of the 9 patients who had infiltrates (78%). Another study followed 5 patients with ABPA for a mean of 15 years.46 All were treated with inhaled corticosteroids, and they used only short courses of oral corticosteroids for symptomatic exacerbations. None of the patients demonstrated deterioration of spirometry results, although 2 of the 5 may have developed some localized bronchiectasis. None developed any respiratory impairment.

Based on these limited data, the use of inhaled corticosteroids may be considered in ABPA patients to control break-through asthma symptoms as the corticosteroid dose is decreased. Often these symptoms can be controlled with inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled bronchodilators. In ABPA patients who cannot be weaned off corticosteroids, it is reasonable to attempt to use inhaled corticosteroids in weaning. In this situation, the clinician must continue to be vigilant that the underlying disease is under control in asymptomatic patients by monitoring serum IgE levels, chest radiographs, and pulmonary function because lung damage may occur in asymptomatic patients.

Antifungal Therapy

It has been hypothesized that reducing the fungal burden in the respiratory tract of ABPA patients would decrease chronic antigenic stimulation, reduce the inflammatory response, ameliorate symptoms, and possibly reduce the longterm risk of progression.1 This has been the rationale for investigating the use of antifungal therapy for ABPA.

Several studies of antifungal agents, oral or inhaled, have been performed and have recently been reviewed.1,35,47 Inhaled nystatin, inhaled natamycin, inhaled amphotericin B, hamycin, miconazole, clotrimazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole have all been effective.1,35,47 Itraconazole has been studied the most.13,48-58 Itraconazole has been effective in improving symptoms, reducing the baseline corticosteroid dose, allowing patients to discontinue corticosteroids, decreasing Aspergillus titers, improving radiographic abnormalities, and improving pulmonary function. Recently, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral itraconazole, 200 mg twice daily, for ABPA was conducted.55 Statistically and clinically significant improvement was seen in pulmonary symptoms, pulmonary function, chest radiographs, and serum IgE levels in the itraconazole group compared with those receiving placebo.

On the basis of these data, itraconazole should be considered as adjunctive therapy in ABPA. It should probably not be used for an initial bout of ABPA. However, it should be strongly considered for ABPA patients who relapse and for corticosteroid-dependent patients in attempt to reduce or discontinue corticosteroid therapy. It is intuitive that fungal serology and fungal culture and sensitivity may be important to ensure that fungus implicated in a case of ABPA is sensitive to itraconazole. Voriconazole has not yet been studied for ABPA, but it is likely to be effective given its excellent activity against A fumigatus.59-61

b-Agonists/Other Therapy

No clinical trials have been conducted to determine the role of bronchodilators such as b-agonists, anticholinergics, and leukotriene antagonists in ABPA. At the present time, a rational approach would be to use inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators to treat asthma symptoms as recommended by the National Institutes of Health asthma guidelines.62

Although it has been shown that there are more ABPA exacerbations during seasons with peak mold counts,63 Aspergillus is ubitquitous and cannot be avoided. However, patients should avoid environments with high mold counts, such as work in organic farming and moldy living quarters.31

ABPA in Cystic Fibrosis

ABPA is common in CF patients, although it is problematic to estimate the prevalence because the diagnostic criteria are not standardized. ABPA and CF share many clinical and laboratory findings, so differentiation is difficult. As previously mentioned, 7 to 9% of CF patients develop ABPA.12,13,64 Observational studies from large CF databases show a much lower prevalence, which suggests that ABPA is underdiagnosed in CF.65 Exacerbations of both diseases may present with infiltrates, acute increased wheezing, and sputum production, often accompanied by fever, weight loss, and fatigue.66 Proximal bronchiectasis is also common to both, and a bronchiectatic flare with hemoptysis may herald either recurrence of ABPA or a bacterial infection in CF.66

The diagnosis of ABPA in CF is further complicated by the fact that certain immunologic findings, such as positive Aspergillus precipitins and peripheral blood eosinophilia can be found in CF patients sensitized to Aspergillus antigens with and without ABPA.66,67 Both clinical symptoms and serologic data must be assessed in establishing the diagnosis of ABPA in CF patients.66 Table 4 lists the criteria for the diagnosis of ABPA in a CF patient.13


Table 4. Criteria for Diagnosis of Acute ABPA in Patients With CF*
Immunologic Criteria (All 5 Required)

1. Immediate skin test reactivity or serum IgE antibodies to A fumigatus

2. Blood eosinophilia >400/mm3

3. IgE >500 IU/mL (or twofold rise in IgE to >500 IU/mL)

4. Serum precipitins or IgG antibodies to A fumigatus

5. Reduction by !50% in IgE after ≥ 2 wk of daily systemic corticosteroid therapy (≥ 0.5 mg/kg/d)

Supportive Criteria (At Least 3 of 5 Required)

1. Airways obstruction/wheezing

2. Bronchiectasis on chest CT

3. Pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiograph

4. A fumigatus in sputum culture

5. Decrease in pulmonary function (!10% decrease in FEV1)

*Adapted from Nepomuceno et al.13

CF patients with ABPA appear to have more severe pulmonary disease. Compared with CF patients who do not have ABPA, patients with CF and ABPA have worse spirometry, more frequently have hemoptysis, and are more likely to have a pneumothorax.64

The treatment of ABPA in CF patients is similar to those without CF. As mentioned previously, it is important to attempt to differentiate a bacterial exacerbation of CF from an ABPA flare before embarking on corticosteroid treatment. A serologic assessment is essential as part of this evaluation. Itraconazole has been recommended as adjunctive therapy for ABPA flares in CF.13,68

Summary

ABPA is a form of asthma related to a hypersensitivity reaction to Aspergillus. ABPA needs to be considered and diagnosed at an early stage because proper therapy may prevent permanent lung damage. Monitoring patients with ABPA is likewise important to avoid permanent sequelae. Oral corticosteroids are the cornerstone of therapy for ABPA. Inhaled corticosteroids and antifungal agents, such as itraconazole, are promising and should be considered in the treatment of ABPA, especially in corticosteroid-dependent patients. Bronchodilators are an adjunctive therapy and should be used for asthmatic symptoms.

References

  1. Vlahakis NE, Aksamit TR. Diagnosis and treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76:930–938
  2. Schuyler MR. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Chest Med 1983; 4:15–22
  3. Patterson R, Greenberger PA, Harris KE. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis [editorial]. Chest 2000; 118:7–8
  4. Hinson KF, Moon AJ, Plummer NS. Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Thorax 1952; 7:317–333
  5. Greenberger P. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Allergy Immunol 2002; 16:449–468
  6. Ricketti AJ, Greenberger PA, Patterson R. Immediate-type reactions in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1983; 71:541–545
  7. Malo JL, Hawkins R, Pepys J. Studies in chronic allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: clinical and physiological findings. Thorax 1977; 32:254–261
  8. Varkey B. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: clinical perspectives. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 1998; 18:480–501
  9. Eaton T, Garrett J, Milne D, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in an asthma clinic. Chest 2000; 118:66–72
  10. Patterson R, Greenberger PA, Halwig JM, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: natural history and classification of early disease by serologic and roentgenographic studies. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146:916–918
  11. Basich JE, Graves TS, Nasir Baz M, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in corticosteroid-dependent asthmatics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1981; 68:98–102
  12. Mroueh S, Spock A. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 1994; 105:32–36
  13. Nepomuceno IB, Esrig S, Moss RB. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis: role of atopy and response to itraconazole. Chest 1999; 115:364–370
  14. McCarthy DS, Simon G, Hargreave FE. The radiological appearances in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Radiol 1970; 21:366–375
  15. Neeld DA, Goodman LR, Gurney JW, et al. Computerized tomography in the evaluation of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 142:1200–1205
  16. Lynch DA. Imaging of asthma and allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis. Radiol Clin North Am 1998; 36:129–142
  17. Malo JP, Pepys J, Simon G. Studies in chronic allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: 2. Radiological findings. Thorax 1977; 32:262–268
  18. Phelan MS, Kerr IH. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: the radiological appearance during long-term follow-up. Clin Radiol 1984; 35:385–392
  19. Ward S, Heyneman L, Lee MJ, et al. Accuracy of CT in the diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in asthmatic patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:937–942
  20. Mitchell TAM, Hamilos DL, Lynch DA, et al. Distribution and severity of bronchiectasis in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. J Asthma 2000; 37:65–72
  21. Crameri R, Hemmann S, Ismail C, et al. Disease-specific recombinant allergens for the diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Int Immunol 1998; 10:1211–1216
  22. Banerjee B, Kurup VP, Greenberger PA, et al. Cloning and expression of Aspergillus fumigatus allergen Asp f 16 mediating both humoral and cell- mediated immunity in allergic bronchopulmonary asgergillosis (ABPA). Clin Exp Allergy 2001; 31:761–770
  23. Kurup VP, Grunig G, Knutsen AP, et al. Cytokines in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Res Immunol 1998; 149:466–477
  24. Kahn S, McClellan JS, Knutsen AP. Increased sensitivity to IL-4 in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Allergy Immunol 2000; 123:319–326
  25. Chauhan B, Santiago L, Hutcheson PS, et al. Evidence for the involvement of two different MHC class II regions in susceptibility or protection in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 106:723–729
  26. Cockrill BA, Hales CA. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Ann Rev Med 1999; 50:303–316
  27. Ricketti AJ, Greenberger PA, Mintzer RA, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143:1553–1557
  28. Elliott MW, Newman Taylor AJ. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Exp Allergy 1997; 27(suppl 1):55–59
  29. Greenberger PA, Patterson R. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: model of bronchopulmonary disease with defined serologic, radiologic, pathologic and clinical findings from asthma to fatal destructive lung disease. Chest 1987; 91(suppl):165S–171S
  30. Rosenberg M, Patterson R, Roberts, M, et al. The assessment of immunologic and clinical changes occurring during corticosteroid therapy for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Am J Med 1978; 64:599–606
  31. Greenberger PA, Patterson R. Diagnosis and management of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Ann Allergy 1986; 56:444–448
  32. Sahn SA. Lakshminarayan S. Allergic bronchopulmonary penicillosis. Chest 1973; 63:286–288
  33. Hishino H, Tagaki S, Kon H, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis due to Aspergillus niger without bronchial asthma. Respiration 1999; 66:369–372
  34. Moss RB. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2002; 23:87–104
  35. Wark PAB, Gibson PG. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: new concepts of pathogenesis and treatment. Respirology 2001; 6:1–7
  36. Capewell S, Chapman BJ, Alexander F, et al. Corticosteroid treatment and prognosis in pulmonary eosinophilia. Thorax 1989; 44:925–929
  37. Safirstein BH, D’Sousa MF, Simon G, et al. Five year follow-up of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1973; 108:450–459
  38. Middleton WG, Paterson IC, Grant IWB, et al. Asthmatic pulmonary eosinophilia: a review of 65 cases. Br J Dis Chest 1977; 71:115–122
  39. Wang JL, Patterson R, Roberts M, et al. The management of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979; 120:87–92
  40. Fink JN. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Chest 1985; 87(suppl):81S–84S
  41. Rosenberg M, Patterson R, Mintzer R, et al. Clinical and immunologic criteria for the diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Ann Intern Med 1977; 86:405–414
  42. McCarthy DS, Pepys J. Allergic broncho-pulmonary aspergillosis: clinical immunology; 2. Skin, nasal and bronchial tests. Clin Allergy 1971; 1:415–432
  43. Stevens DA, Kan VL, Judson MA, et al. Practice guidelines for disease caused by aspergillus. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30:696–709
  44. Report to the Research Committee of the British Thoracic Society: inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Br J Dis Chest 1979; 73:349–356
  45. Hilton AM, Chatterjee SS. Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate. Postgrad Med J 1975; 51(suppl 4):98–103
  46. Seaton A, Seaton RA, Wightman AJA. Management of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Q J Med 1994; 87:529–537
  47. Leon EE, Craig TJ. Antifungals in the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999; 82:511–516
  48. Germaud P, Tuchais E. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis treated with itraconazole. Chest 1995; 107:883
  49. Pacheco A, Martin JA, Cuevas M. Serologic response to itraconazole in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Chest 1993; 103:980–981
  50. De Beule K, De Doncher P, Cauwenbergh G, et al. The treatment of aspergillosis and aspergilloma with itraconazole, clinical results and open label study (1982-1987). Mycoses 1988; 31:476–485
  51. Chabasse D, Tuchais E, Bouchara JP, et al. Efficacite de l’itraconazole dans le traitment de l’aspergillosis broncho-pulmonare allergique (ABPA), a propos de 2 observations. Bull Soc Fr Myc Med 1990; 19:271–275
  52. Nikaido Y, Nagata N, Yamamoto T, et al. A case of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis successfully treated with itraconazole. Respir Med 1998; 92:118–119
  53. Matsuzaki Y, Jimi T, Tao Y, et al. [Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis successfully treated with itraconazole]. Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi 1997; 35:352–356
  54. Salez F, Brichet A, Desurmont S, et al. Effects of itraconazole therapy in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Chest 1999; 116:1665–1668
  55. Stevens DA, Schwartz HJ, Lee JY, et al. A Randomized trial of itraconazole in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. New Engl J Med 2000; 342:756–762
  56. Denning DW, Van Wye JE, Lewiston NJ, et al. Adjunctive therapy of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with itraconazole. Chest 1991; 100:813–819
  57. Mannes GP, van der Heide S, van Aalderen WM, et al. Itraconazole and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in two brothers with cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1993; 341:492
  58. Lebeau B, Pelloux H, Pinel C, et al. Itraconazole in the treatment of aspergillosis: a study of 16 cases. Mycoses 1994; 37:171–179
  59. Serrano Mdel C, Valverde-Conde A, Chavez MM, et al. In vitro activity of voriconazole, itraconazole, caspofungin, anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) and amphotericin B against aspergillus spp. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 45:131–135
  60. Measaki S, Iwakawa J, Higashiyama Y, et al. Antifungal activity of a new triazole, voriconazole (UK-109496), against clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. J Infect Chemother 2000; 6:101–103
  61. Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, et al. Antifungal activities of posaconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole compared to those of itraconazole and amphotericin B against 239 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. and other filamentous fungi: report from SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, 2000. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46:1032–1037
  62. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report 2: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma; clinical practice guidelines, component 3. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, April 1997; Publication No. 97-405
  63. Radin RC, Greenberger PA, Patterson R, et al. Mould counts and exacerbations of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Allergy 1983; 13:271–275
  64. Mastella G, Rainisio M, Harms HK, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis: a European epidemiological study. Eur Respir J 2000; 16:464–471
  65. Geller DE, Kaplowitz H, Light M, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis: reported prevalence, regional distribution, and patient characteristics. Chest 1999; 116:639–646
  66. Hanley-Lopez J, Clement LT. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2000; 8:540–544
  67. Hutcheson PS, Rejent AJ, Slavin RG. Variability in parameters of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991; 88:390–394
  68. Skov M, Hoiby N, Koch C. Itraconazole treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with cystic fibrosis. Allergy 2002; 57:723–728