The Guidelines Oversight Committee (GOC) aims to optimize clinical care by overseeing the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. The GOC ensures CHEST guidelines meet the ongoing and emerging needs of CHEST membership and their patients and provide a foundation for initiatives across the organization.
The GOC is comprised of members in the following content areas: asthma, chest infections, COPD, clinical practice, critical care, diffuse lung disease, pulmonary vascular disease, sleep, and thoracic oncology.
Although selection is not restricted to these domains, this year, the GOC will place emphasis on members with expertise in asthma, critical care, chest infections, and sleep medicine. Expertise in these areas will ensure that the GOC is aware of emerging literature in these areas that can help shape the guideline portfolio.
Responsibilities
The GOC makes recommendations to the CHEST Board of Regents on issues related to health, science, and clinical policy in areas of cardiopulmonary medicine and surgery, critical care, sleep medicine, and related disciplines.
Members of the GOC must have past experience on a CHEST committee, task force, editorial board, or CHEST guideline and expertise in a necessary content area as demonstrated by publication history, active research, project work, thought leadership, clinical experience, and/or a strong network among the community.
Applicants should have familiarity with CHEST’s evidence-based guidelines and their development (using GRADE methodology), such as serving on a CHEST guideline panel or having demonstrated experience in the development of systematic reviews or evidence-based recommendations.
Prior participation in coursework in areas of evidence-based medicine (eg, CHEST Guideline Methodology courses, Cochrane courses, GRADE workshops) is also valuable but not necessary. Awareness of the various stakeholders related to clinical practice guidelines—such as the National Academy of Medicine, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network, and similar entities—is also valuable not but necessary.
Additional responsibilities include:
- Leverage knowledge of organizational priorities and the clinical landscape to support the annual call for topics and selection of new guidelines.
- Serve as liaisons to guideline chairs and support to staff methodologists, helping to identify and work through barriers to timeline adherence.
- Communicate key information affecting volunteers, including topic selection or rejection, panel nomination outcomes, and declaration of relationships.
- Ensure diverse and necessary perspectives are included in guidelines through review and selection of chair-nominated and self-nominated guideline panelists.
- Facilitate organizational reviews of CHEST guideline manuscripts.
- Support post-publication guideline dissemination activities.
- Leverage knowledge of organizational priorities, the clinical landscape, and current CHEST guidelines to inform topic selection of other CHEST documents.
- Nominate or serve as a CHEST representative to serve as a guideline panelist on outside society guidelines being considered for CHEST endorsement.
- Nominate or serve as a reviewer of outside society guidelines being considered for CHEST endorsement.
- Serve as a domain liaison to a guideline panel.
Domain liaison responsibilities include:
- Monitor conflict of interest policy adherence of guideline panelists.
- Attend guideline panel meetings.
- Participate, as desired, in panel deliberations/guideline development.
- Liaise with the GOC on problems and barriers to timely progress.
Clive Kearon Fellowship
The Clive Kearon Guideline Fellow is designed to acquaint early career clinicians with key aspects of guideline development, dissemination, and implementation. This unique opportunity will further expand CHEST’s role as a leader in guideline development and guideline innovation. Learn more about the Clive Kearon Fellowship.
Time Commitment
Committee members should expect the following time commitments within a given calendar year.
Participation in the following meetings:
- Monthly one-hour conference calls – 12 hours
- Spring in-person meeting – 1.5 days
- Domain liaison participation (time varies per guideline)
Participation in the guideline proposal review process:
- Six to 10 hours each March/April
Participation in the guideline manuscript review process:
- Six to 10 hours throughout the year